'Disappearing Doctors' Web site admits to posting erroneous info
04/02/2004
Editor:
In a posting on the Web site for the Politically Active Physicians Association (PAPA), Donna Baver Rovito admitted that the list of "Disappearing Doctors" she maintains and that is the source of the oft-cited number of doctors who have supposedly left Pennsylvania because of high medical malpractice insurance rates is fundamentally flawed - because no one checks to make sure the claims are accurate.

Confronted with yet another erroneous listing, Baver Rovito admitted, "I simply don't have the resources to personally check out each piece of information which is e-mailed to me."
Despite the fact that no one checks to make sure that the claims are correct, the doctors and others who want to restrict an injured parties' ability to collect fair compensation for their injuries continue to cite them anyway.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time that a claim central to the doctors' argument that caps are needed has been based on unverified anecdotes rather than hard data. Nor is it the first time that the anecdotes that have proven to be false upon full inspection.
Doctors have long claimed that Pennsylvania is facing an exodus of doctors. However, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Insurance, the number of doctors has been increasing over the last three years, with approximately 1,000 more doctors paying into the state's mandatory MCare system than just three years ago. This new information supports the findings by the General Accounting Office (GAO) that the number of physicians per capita in Pennsylvania has increased in the past few years (Scranton Times, 11/28/03).
And just last month it was revealed that when a doctor representing the Pennsylvania Medical Society told a state Senate committee that the number of malpractice insurers in Pennsylvania consists of "technically, three insurers, but only two that are really doing anything," they were wrong as well.
They made this claim despite the fact that according to Insurance Department records, eight insurers wrote more than $20 million in premiums in 2002, the most recent year for which figures are available, and 13 wrote more than $10 million. More than 80 malpractice insurers collected premiums from health-care providers in the state. An insurance department spokesman charitably called the doctor's claim of "three insurers" in Pennsylvania "misleading."
At some point, isn't enough enough? When will the doctors be called to account for their repeatedly false and misleading statements?

Dan Fee
PA Citizens for Fairness

 

ŠThe Citizens Voice 2004