|
Malpractice
suits not about chance to ‘hit the jackpot’
I
was highly offended by a recent story and letter to the editor
in your paper, both of which talked about how victims of medical
malpractice and their lawyers are just looking to “hit the
jackpot.”
My wife, Maureen, died in 1998
at age 43 because of malpractice. My lawyers from the Foley law
firm won the largest malpractice verdict in the history Monroe
County -- $5.4 million. Funny, I don’t feel like I “hit the
jackpot.” And my two sons, who no longer have their mom,
don’t feel like they “hit the jackpot” either. As for my
lawyers, they would rather never have to try a case like
Maureen’s again. And as for their fees, they were worth every
penny.
Maureen didn’t sue her
doctors to “hit the jackpot.” She was outraged that three
different doctors over a period of two and a half years failed
to diagnose her breast cancer, even though she kept going back
and complaining about the lumps in her breast. Maureen sued her
doctors because she wanted to change the system so that the same
thing didn’t happen to other women. It’s pathetic to say,
but the system hasn’t changed one bit.
I have a proposal that will
eliminate misdiagnosis of breast cancer, save thousands of
women’s lives and reduce the number of lawsuits. I would
welcome any doctor to call me anytime to discuss my proposal in
more detail, or visit my Web site at www.maureensmission.org.
To Dr. Joseph Anistranski of
the Luzerne County Medical Society, who wrote the letter to the
editor, and Bob Surrick of the Politically Active Physicians
Association, I say shame on you. If you want to eliminate
lawsuits, eliminate malpractice. And don’t try to tell me and
my boys that Maureen’s life was only worth $250,000.
William
C. Thiel Exeter Borough
|