03/26/2005

Republicans are playing politics with medical malpractice victim


Editor:

How can President Bush and Republican congressional leaders go to such great lengths to protect the rights of malpractice victim Terri Schiavo, but wouldn't think twice about taking away the Constitutional right of every other victim of medical negligence to fair and just compensation? Could it be politics?

When they can get lots of media attention and pander to their base, Republicans in Washington will climb over one another to protect the rights of a malpractice victim. But if you're one of the hundreds of thousands of other people injured or killed by malpractice every year - the people whose cases don't make national headlines - they won't lift a finger to help you, and they'll tell you your life's only worth $250,000. Their hypocrisy is truly shameful.

The cap on non-economic damages being pushed by the president and his congressional allies would reduce the value of the lives of people just like Terri - stay-at-home mothers, housewives, children, retirees, the poor, the mentally ill and other non-wage earners - to a maximum of $250,000.

While we deeply sympathize with the many years of pain and suffering endured by Terri and her family as a result of medical negligence, politicians who promote caps as a way to solve the so-called "malpractice crisis" can't have it both ways. They can't defend the rights of Terri and not the rights of everyone else injured by malpractice. Every victim deserves respect, sympathy and justice, regardless of whether it's politically advantageous.

Paul R. Lyon, Executive Director
The Committee for Justice for All

 

ŠThe Citizens Voice 2005