|
In a Jan. 6 Sunday Times-Tribune opinion
column, Dr. Lewis Sharps, of the Positive Physicians Insurance
Exchange, outlined some of the successes Pennsylvania has had
in addressing the issues surrounding medical liability
litigation, and called for more action by Gov. Ed Rendell and
the state Legislature.
Dr. Sharps is correct in asserting that more
needs to be done, but not as he suggests by further limiting the
legal rights of injured patients. Instead, our officials and
lawmakers should focus on fully addressing the shortcomings of
the insurance and health-care industries.
We must not ignore, as did Dr. Sharps, the underlying epidemic
of medical errors that still plagues our nation’s hospitals
and has resisted resolution for almost a decade since the
Institute of Medicine confirmed that up to 98,000 deaths occur
annually due to preventable errors.
Mr. Rendell’s efforts have disclosed that, in addition to the
grief and suffering caused by mistakes, these errors and the
resulting hospital readmissions cost Pennsylvanians almost $1
billion annually; that poor management of those requiring
chronic care adds another $1.7 billion; and that
hospital-acquired infections, which could be prevented by
doctors and nurses simply washing their hands, increase costs by
another $3.5 billion.
Over the past year, both Medicare and the Leapfrog Group, a
coalition of private industry health-care payers, have taken the
unprecedented step of refusing to pay for additional health-care
costs stemming from medical mistakes and hospital-acquired
infections. The National Quality Forum has identified more than
two dozen types of “never events” — medical no-brainers
that should never occur in a health-care setting. Those “never
events” include wrong-site surgery, which the Pennsylvania
Patient Safety Authority has documented as occurring virtually
every other day in our commonwealth’s operating rooms.
While hospital patients are subject to at least one drug error a
day, according to a July 2006 report by the Institute of
Medicine, hospitals continue to lag in establishing computerized
systems that make sure patients get the right medicines and
correct dosages.
The Patient Safety Authority’s annual report for 2006
documented more than 6,400 serious events resulting in
unnecessary and preventable deaths or serious injuries in our
state’s hospitals. During the same year, injured patients or
their survivors filed only 1,700 medical negligence lawsuits in
Pennsylvania.
Finally, although the total amount of money paid to injured
patients has been cut in half in recent years, the dramatic
decrease in claims has not been reflected in doctors’
insurance rates.
The conclusion that must be drawn from these facts is that we
need to reduce and eliminate those actions and errors that are
injuring patients and driving health-care costs skyward. Here
are some suggestions:
- Require hospitals to install modern
information technology to track patient care and
medications.
- Require hospitals to prominently display
infection rates for post-operative, intensive care and the
facility in general, along with a comparison to regional and
statewide figures.
- Require hospitals to develop and implement
infection-reduction strategies.
- Require Pennsylvania to follow the lead of
a large and growing number of states to post the malpractice
records of doctors and hospitals online with meaningful
summaries of what occurred, so that patients and families
can make informed choices about their health-care providers.
In addition, insurance companies must be
better regulated for benefit of both the victims and the medical
profession. The state should require any rate increase above the
cost of living to be justified. Insurance carriers should also
be mandated to disclose all administrative costs and cash
reserves, and to distinguish between reserves for potential
future losses and actual payouts, which are often far less.
Dr. Sharps and others who propose limitations on the legal
rights of injured patients know that those measures do nothing
to reduce the actual amount of medical negligence. Rather, the
schemes they put forth only seek to minimize the impact of
legitimate lawsuits on those responsible for the errors. As
such, they have misdiagnosed the problem and prescribed the
wrong medicine. Patient safety reform and insurance reform, not
closing the courthouse to injured patients and their families,
is the needed tonic.
|